Viewing Category:
[
clear category selection]
(displaying entries
1 - 20)
Alasdair Macnab, FCMA, CGMA, director of corporate services for the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, has adapted the Balanced Scorecard to create a new way of measuring the HR and financial costs of meeting strategic objectives. In this article he shares how his innovative approach, coupled with the Executive Strategy Manager, enable strategic objective budgeting. The system he has built offers insight into the input costs for each objective on the scorecard which can then be juxtaposed with the achievement of the objectives, realized through the associated measure performance.
Read the article at: http://www.cgma.org/Magazine/Features/Pages/Strategic-Objective-Costing.aspx
Balanced Scorecard,
BSC Hall of Fame,
Business Leadership,
Client Success,
Competitive Advantage,
Decision Making,
ESM Features,
ESM General Information,
ESM Tips and Tricks,
Innovation,
Operational Reporting,
Reporting,
Strategy Maps,
Sustainability
|
Posted
2/8/12
@ 2:51 PM
by ESM Team ESM Team
Drs. Kaplan and Norton recently shared with us the future of the most powerful management concept of the past 75 years (according to Harvard Business School). As published in the CGMA inaugural issue a few days ago, the gurus lay out five key guidelines for this framework in the future:
1. Collaborate with external constituents, such as key suppliers, customers and alliance partners, to develop a strategy map that describes and communicates the strategic relationship; once developed, the map and scorecard are used to govern and guide the relationship.
2. Realize that cities and provinces, and even nations, around the world are using our framework for describing and communicating strategies for competitive advantage, and then successfully implementing their visions with our strategy execution system.
3. Use the strategy map as a jumping-off point for risk management, especially the identification and management of strategic risks.
4. Use the strategy map as a central change management tool.
5. Expand the role for analytics in the strategy execution system.
Read more at:
[hide extended entry]
Balanced Scorecard,
BSC Hall of Fame,
Business Leadership,
Client Success,
Competitive Advantage,
Decision Making,
ESM General Information,
Initiative Management,
Innovation,
Operational Reporting,
Reporting,
Risk Management,
Strategy Maps,
Sustainability
|
Posted
2/8/12
@ 2:48 PM
by ESM Team ESM Team
It really is that simple. You need the right people engaged and supporting the cause within the organization, you need the process in place to ensure youa re taking the right steps in the strategy management framework, and you need to accelerate your time to results while making the effort sustainable through technology. I'll go over the role of each below.
A. People: Leadership
- Communicates vision, values, and mission to inspire the organization to perform
- Makes the case for change so the organization is dissatisfied with the status quo
- Clarifies the strategic intent to signal the direction in which the organization should move
- Build consensus in the management team to empower them to drive the strategy to results
- Lead by example to embody the kind of behaviors that others must adopt to succeed
B: Process: Office of Strategy Management (OSM)
- Makes strategy management a core competency within your organization to achieve results
· Coordinates cross-business processes to align businesses across the enterprise
· Ensures sustainability of the strategy management system—to survive churn at the top of the organization and adapt to changing economic environment
· Manages strategic risk factors that have strategic relevance
· Achieves strategic synergy across the enterprise
C: Infrastructure/Technology
- Develops common platforms and systems that enable effective integration of businesses
- Implements architecture and tools that automate performance management capabilities
- Cascades strategy maps and scorecards down to individuals to align the entire organization
- Captures and analysis data and information that enables better decision making
- Integrates the management process with technology to link strategy and operations
[hide extended entry]
Now that the Execution Premium book by Drs. Kaplan and Norton has been out in the market for a number of years, let's take a look at the benefits that can be realized through the XPP implementation in your organizaiton. Let's take it a couple stages at a time. Stage 1 and 2 looked at Develop the Strategy and Translate the Strategy, stages 3 and 4: Align the Organization with the Strategy and 4: Plan Operations. Now let's look at stages 5: Monitor and Learn and 6: Test and Adapt. In these last two stages, strategy becomes part of the fabric of the organization's management process and governance model right alongside operational review meetings. A business intelligence capability nees to be formalized and linked to the strategy. As part of testing the strategy, new insights should be shared, and strategic and operational processes can be altered to ensure maximum effectiveness. This feedback loop brings you back to strategy refresh, translation and alignment, thus closing the loop on the XPP management system. Some of the benefits realized in these final stages include:
STAGE 5: MONITOR AND LEARN
- Develops a BI competency center to assure accurate, timely data to improve decision making
- Develops an analytic information architecture to harness data, information, and insight
- Creates a governance process and calendar to manage strategy as a process that delivers results
- Conducts strategy and operational review meetings to ensure strategy execution is on track
STAGE 6: TEST AND ADAPT
- Confirms effectiveness of the strategy
- Models business and operational processes to optimize ability to execute the strategy
- Analyzes results in order to make necessary modifications to achieve performance outcomes. Provides direction on what is working and what needs improvement
[hide extended entry]
Balanced Scorecard,
BSC Hall of Fame,
Business Leadership,
Client Success,
Competitive Advantage,
Decision Making,
ESM General Information,
Initiative Management,
Innovation,
Reporting,
Sustainability
|
Posted
9/14/11
@ 3:42 PM
by ESM Team ESM Team
Now that the Execution Premium book by Drs. Kaplan and Norton has been out in the market for a number of years, let's take a look at the benefits that can be realized through the XPP implementation in your organizaiton. Let's take it a couple stages at a time. Stage 1 and 2 looked at Develop the Strategy and Translate the Strategy. Now let's look at stages 3 and 4: Align the Organization With the Strategy and 5: Plan Operations. In these stages, the strategy has been clarified with scorecards and strategy maps at the enterprise level so now they need to be cascaded down into the business and support areas to ensure vertical alignment. Individuals might employ personal Balanced Scorecards and development plans to link the performance review process with the strategy. A communication program around the strategy is also paramount. The organization can begin to link strategy to key processes, driver models, and dashboards. Rolling forecasts and dynamic resource allocation are often found around the operational planning step.
STAGE 3: ALIGN THE ORGANIZATION WITH THE STRATEGY
- Defines the corporate role so that organizational units receive strategic guidance & direction
- Cascades strategy maps and scorecards to ensure organizational alignment to the strategy
- Leverages synergies between corporate, SBU, shared services, and other units to ensure alignment
- Communicates the strategy so that everyone understands his/her role in executing it
- Aligns team and individual goals and incentives to ensure the behavioral changes required for success
STAGE 4: PLAN OPERATIONS
- Identifies critical processes required to execute the strategy
- Establishes cross-functional business teams to drive performance across organizational boundaries
- Develops rolling forecasts and dynamic resource allocation to link strategy and operations
- Implements driver based planning to identify the critical levers of performance
- Creates operational dashboards that identify the key performance indicators that drive performance
[hide extended entry]
Balanced Scorecard,
BSC Hall of Fame,
Business Leadership,
Client Success,
Competitive Advantage,
Decision Making,
ESM Development Team,
ESM Features,
ESM General Information,
ESM Tips and Tricks,
Initiative Management,
Innovation,
Operational Reporting,
Personal Balanced Scorecard,
Reporting,
Risk Management,
Software as a Service,
Strategy Maps,
Sustainability
|
Posted
9/7/11
@ 2:25 PM
by ESM Team ESM Team
Now that the Execution Premium book by Drs. Kaplan and Norton has been out in the market for a number of years, let's take a look at the benefits that can be realized through the XPP implementation in your organizaiton. Let's take it a couple stages at a time. Stage 1 and 2 of 6: Develop the Strategy and Translate the Strategy. These stages are where the organization performs S.W.O.T. analysis, Gap and shift statements, identifies key overarching strategies, clarifies the mission and vision and key risks. Then the strategy is developed into Balanced Scorecards and strategy maps. Typically an Office of Strategy Management (OSM) or other like group/individual is tapped to manage the strategy implementation and execution.
STAGE 1: DEVELOP THE STRATEGY
- Defines how shareholder value will be created to achieve new levels of performance
- Identifies required changes from current to future state so the organization understands it
- Quantifies vision, values, mission, objectives, and risks so they are measurable
- Analyzes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to determine course of action
- Formulates strategy so that the entire organization can execute it
STAGE 2: TRANSLATE THE STRATEGY
- Clarifies strategy with a strategy map to produce a one-page action plan that works
- Develops a Balanced Scorecard to specify objectives, targets, measures, and initiatives
- Identifies key risk indicators that must be managed to avoid failure to execute
- Focuses on initiatives with the greatest impact to accelerate time to results
- Allocates resources dynamically to produce the most effective outcomes
[hide extended entry]
Balanced Scorecard,
BSC Hall of Fame,
Business Leadership,
Client Success,
Competitive Advantage,
ESM Features,
Initiative Management,
Innovation,
Operational Reporting,
Personal Balanced Scorecard,
Reporting,
Strategy Maps,
Sustainability
|
Posted
8/31/11
@ 3:19 PM
by ESM Team ESM Team
Bain & Company released their 2011 Management Tools & Trends report with the Balanced Scorecard coming in at the 6th position. There were 11,000 respondents and the geographical makeup was 40% North America, 30% EMEA, 20% APAC and 10% Latin America. The usage in 2010 was 47% and the 2011 projected usage is 63%, mainly driven by emerging market executives who are seeking to improve their organization’s strategy execution capabilities.
For those of us who have participated in the scorecard creation process know that measures creation is both an art and science. Arriving at the right measure(s) for an objective is not an easy process once you get out of the financial perspective and beyond the classic customer satisfaction measure in the customer perspective. My colleagues and I have been discussing some good books on the topic so I'd like to share that reading list with you.
- “Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths & Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-Based Management” by Pfeffer and Sutton
- "Bullseye" by Schiemann and Lingle
- "Super Crunchers" by Ayres
- "Winning", "Keeping Score", and "Beyond the Balanced Scorecard" by Mark Graham Brown
- "Performance Dashboards" by Eckerson
- "Key Performance Indicators" by Parmenter
- "How to Measure Anything" by Hubbard
[hide extended entry]
Palladium Group’s surveys conducted in 2009 and 2010 across public and private sector organizations in Asia Pacific concluded that leadership commitment was the most critical factor in effective strategy execution. Surprisingly, only 50% of the survey respondents reported “moderate” to “very good” performance in turning their strategy into clear and actionable objectives.
In this year’s global survey we will examine (1) The disconnect between what leaders view as critical to organizational performance and what they actually practice, and (2) the specific leadership success factors for effective strategy execution. The survey takes approximately 20-30 minutes to complete and will be accessible until August 15th, 2011.
In appreciation for your time spent on this survey, we will provide you with:
- The survey results, prior to their general release in November 2011
- Complimentary membership in Palladium’s online Execution Premium Community (XPC) with access to executives globally willing to share experience and insights
ESM continues to make it's mark on earth, positively impacting governments and private organizations around the world with their ability to execute strategy.
The purpose of our trip to Kuwait was to install ESM, interface with government leadership, discuss project objectives, and create alignment between the process and technology so that the government is positioned well for success. Although the Balanced Scorecard and ESM has been heavily used within governments around the world, there have been very few implementations for the entire country's government. Kuwait Government is on the Vanguard with strategy execution and with it's implementation of the Balanced Scorecard program.
[hide extended entry]
Judging from recent interviews and articles, it appears Balanced Scorecard co-creator Bob Kaplan’s new favorite case study is Volkswagen Brazil. In particular, he is impressed with the company's ability to communicate strategy to its 22,000 employees.
Kaplan is particularly charmed by a Volkswagen robot that roams the corporate premises and “talks” to employees about strategy. Giga, who has the face of a VW Beetle’s hood and wheels as feet, makes star appearances at employee gatherings and also shows up in comic strips to affirm strategic goals for employees.
This thoughtful and creative approach to strategy communications humanizes the idea of strategy, makes it fun and accessible, and gets people talking about it. It has also contributed to a cultural change inside the company, which, in turn, enabled a major financial turnaround.
For companies that can't afford to build a robot, there is a less expensive and more interactive approach available—if interactivity is measured by the vibrancy of human-to-human, rather than human-to-robot, dialogue. With the right selection of social media tools, you can leverage your corporate intranet (or a 3rd party platform) and raise strategy communications to a whole new level. Let’s look at some of the more common social media tools to see how they can be used in the strategy communication process:
Blogs… for Strategy Execution
According to Wikipedia, “Blogs are usually maintained by an individual with regular entries of commentary, descriptions of events, or other material such as graphics or video.” If the purpose of your strategy communication intranet is to communicate strategy, you don’t want to let every employee blog on it (just as you wouldn’t let every employee on stage at a company meeting to discuss strategy). Only your CEO and other executives responsible for communicating strategic objectives should launch a blog series under the banner of strategy communications. Depending on how “young-at-heart” your executives are, they may create and post the blogs themselves. More likely, your communications department will manage the operations of the blog. For example, if an executive is more comfortable speaking than writing, your communication team can film him and post the video entries as a video blog.
Online Discussions…for Strategy Execution
Company employees can comment on executive blogs, but the primary purpose of the strategy blog is for leaders to broadcast the message to the field. An online discussion forum is different. Discussion forums are inherently a more democratic, interactive form of exchange. There is an expectation that the person who begins the discussion will carefully listen to responses and continue to engage as the discussion unfolds. The best discussions begin with an honest question and an appeal for help. These forum discussions are the perfect complement to a more structured application for Balanced Scorecard creation and control.
Private Groups Collaboration…for Strategy Execution
You might not be ready to communicate the strategy to the entire organization. For example, Scott Nadler describes ERM’s strategic communication program in stages, starting with a private discussion between a dozen executive insiders, then to a group of 40, and finally to all 3,000 at the company. The access rights to your online collaboration space should mirror this off-line reality. For example, you might choose to launch a private group for the 40 people inside your own intranet or as a private subgroup in a more public community such as Palladium XPC.
In summary, you have a great new set of inexpensive social tools to help you communicate strategy. If they are deployed carelessly, they will be a waste of time and a distraction. However, with the right matching of specific social tools and oversight to keep the discussions focused, you will find an effective new communication program. This channel will only become more powerful – even transformative -- as more “digital natives” come into the organization.
[hide extended entry]
First Commonwealth Financial Corp (NYSE: FCF), a $5.8B financial holding company (banking, insurance, investment) in Pennsylvania, and a Palladium ESM client, recently issued a press release about its best practice approach to governance, which includes using a Balanced Scorecard to manage and assess the performance of First Commonwealth and its board of directors.
Several of our product experts recently returned from Palladium’s 2010 Americas Summit, held this year in La Jolla, CA. It was a great conference – strong attendance, great speakers, and considerable insight to be gained from both the case studies presented, and personal conversation.
As our experts provided attendees with live demos, they recount numerous occurrences of present clients passing by, and joining in to offer first-hand testimonials. Thanks to them, and to all of you, for being such being such strong proponents of ESM. Hearing the stories of your successes is valuable to those looking for more information, and also makes us truly proud to be a supporting part of your strategy management programs.
Recurrent obstacles identified by attendees we spoke with included 1) employee engagement and 2) effective communication of strategy and strategic performance. As indicated in the third step of the XPP, Alignment requires organizations to align business units AND employees alike to the strategy. In doing so, they often times overlook the most critical component of alignment– communication. Communication is paramount in a Strategy-Focused Organization to develop buy-in and commitment to the strategy at an individual level.
Over the last decade, ESM has made addressing this commonly shared weakness a priority. In continually improving the product to support evolving need, two new features were released this month: a second generation release of ESM’s Personal Balanced Scorecard component – PBSC 2.0, as well as a capability for integrating ESM with SharePoint.
[hide extended entry]
For more than 100 years the national investigative force now known as the Federal Bureau of Investigation has fought corruption and crime in the U.S. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 resulted in a change in strategic priorities, the first being protecting the U.S. from future terrorist attack. For an agency with an $8 billion budget and 34,000 employees, this required a significant change in culture, strategy, organization, processes, and systems. A strategic change agenda paved the way. The Bureau’s Strategy Management Office—now 10 professionals strong—manages strategy with the help of divisional strategy coordinators who are responsible for deploying strategy maps and scorecards. Performance results have dramatically improved. These include enhanced intelligence capability, the degree of intelligence sharing with other agencies, the quality and timeliness of intelligence information, increased surveillance capacity, critical incident response effectiveness, and talent and technology readiness. "The complex threats we face have required a fundamental change in the way we work together," says Robert S. Mueller, III, director. "We created the Strategy Management System to drive and manage change, articulate specific objectives, and measure progress toward those objectives. SMS has been incredibly useful to the FBI, providing the means to focus on long-term goals, while balancing the need to address crime and terrorism, everyday."
The Hall of Fame award honors organizations that have achieved execution excellence through the use of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), the world’s preeminent strategy and performance management system. The BSC is based on the simple premise that "what gets measured is what gets done." Created by Palladium Group co-founders Drs. Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, the Balanced Scorecard links strategy to operations to drive business outcomes. A recent study published in the journal Advances in Accounting found that organizations "that adopt the BSC significantly outperform those that do not…over a three year period beginning with the year of adoption. These results provide strong evidence that the BSC is an effective strategic management tool that leads to improved shareholder returns."
The Balanced Scorecard is equally effective in driving results in government and not-for-profit organizations. A focus on performance is critical for any organization, especially during challenging economic times. "While the global economic environment is improving, many organizations, from private companies to government agencies, still face significant challenges," said Robert L. Howie Jr., Managing Director of Palladium and Director of the Hall of Fame program. "Organizations using the Palladium Kaplan-Norton strategy execution approach are well-equipped to gain the kind of insights needed to capitalize on new opportunities, mitigate risk, and improve organizational performance."
Founded in 2000, the Palladium BSC Hall of Fame program today has a roster of 153 honorees—including Infosys Technologies, Millipore Corporation, Motorola, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and Volkswagen do Brasil—that span private and public sectors in more than 20 countries. Winners are selected based on the quality of their BSC implementation and the results they demonstrate over a period of at least two years.
[hide extended entry]
Despite its value, most organizations' written, objective-level performance analysis is generally not very good. Most performance analysis does not explain the data, discuss its underlying causes and implications, or integrate it into a broader discussion of strategic performance and environmental trends. My recent reading of strategy review reports of a handful of Palladium Balanced Scorecard Hall of Fame for Executing Strategy® organizations proved to me that even exemplars of strategy execution sometimes fall short in their written performance analysis, thus missing valuable opportunities.
Fortunately, this problem can be remedied. Writing insightful, actionable performance analysis is a skill that can be learned. Through Palladium's work guiding dozens of organizations in strategy reporting, we've identified several common pitfalls in performance analysis that performance analysis writers need to learn to avoid.
Pitfall 1: Focusing Only on the Measure Data, without Explaining or Interpreting
Often, performance analysis merely regurgitates what the data already show, or simply explains the components of the corresponding measure(s). What good does that do? Analysis writers need to dig deeper for more contextual data that might explain the performance. What is the reason for the last period's measure performance? How do we explain any period to period trends? What does the measure's outcome tell you about the performance of its corresponding objective?
Pitfall #2: Omitting Qualitative Information
Numbers are concrete, and objective, and therefore make people more comfortable and confident. But they don't tell the whole story. And they can indeed mislead, whether inadvertently or not (think of all the ways statistics can be presented to support any side of an argument). Qualitative information can often reveal the reasons behind the numbers better than the deepest dive into the detailed data can. It would seem self-evident that qualitative information is a critical element for understanding what drives performance. Yet far too often, such information is absent in written analysis.
Pitfall #3: Ignoring the Reasons for the Performance Result
Sometimes all the analysis in the world won't yield a definitive explanation for a performance result. Yet even when there is no certain answer, it is always better to offer a hypothesis than to forgo explanation altogether. For decision makers, there is little that is more unsatisfying than to ask “Why” and be told “I have no idea.” Offering a thoughtful educated guess will at least get the conversation started.
Pitfall #4: Avoiding Any Discussion of Risk
No one likes to be the messenger of bad news, but addressing risk openly and accurately is the key to avoiding unexpected declines in performance and greater risk. Even in our age of heightened risk awareness, risk and strategy are still often viewed as separate areas, one involving all that could go wrong, and the other, all that an organization hopes for. In reality, the two are inextricably linked. The strategy represents a hypothesis of the way the business operates and what activities are crucial to attain the ultimate desired outcome. Each strategic objective is achieved by successfully managing its performance drivers. Since it's a given that there are specific risks that can impede each performance driver; why would such risks not be part of the strategic conversation?
Pitfall #5: Focusing on Details at the Expense of the Bigger Picture
For any number of reasons, performance analysis writers often delve into one aspect of an objective’s performance, overlooking the objective-level view. In fact, it is not uncommon for performance analysis to not even indicate whether the objective is being achieved. Writers must step back from all of the quantitative and qualitative data they have collected and approach objective-level performance analysis by first drafting a summary statement about the objective's overall performance.
To read the full length article, log into the ESM, select Resources: Libraries: BSR: Complete Issues: and select the following issues.
David McMillan, “Five Pitfalls of Writing Performance Analysis,” Balanced Scorecard Report, November – December 2010
…or…
David McMillan, with Barnaby Donlon, “How to Write Performance Analysis That Truly Enhances Decision Making,” Balanced Scorecard Report, November – December 2008
[hide extended entry]
Palladium’s research also involved surveying 101 organizations representing a wide range of industries in order to explore the relationship between their management practices and the performance results they have achieved. Among our most important findings:
IT, if aligned well with strategy, plays a very significant role in determining the ultimate chance of execution success. Integrated, end-to-end software solutions, together with operations governed by robust strategy management systems, constitute a proven method by which organizations and their entire business networks can achieve the Execution Premium. This Palladium white paper reviews the methodology used to align strategy to operations, drills into the three components of operational excellence and walks through how the 6 stage Execution Premium model can help organizations achieve healthy operational alignment. View this and other white papers at Palladium’s white paper site.
[hide extended entry]
I just came across an excellent account of the Balanced Scorecard effort undergone at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. In this paper, BSC champion and strategy director, Alasdair Macnab, along with Chris Carr and Falconer Michell from University of Edinburgh tell the implementation story. They focus their research on how the Balanced Scorecard approach can be successfully adopted for nonprofit businesses. The team also reviews why the Executive Strategy Manager was selected as the preferred solution and how it streamlined the data reporting and presentation while providing leadership and employees froma cross the organization critical line of sight into the strategy.
Key findings cited from the paper include:
Just as strategies are specific to an organisation, the balanced scorecard (BSC)/strategy map can and should be adapted to suit an individual organisation to leverage the full power of the BSC system.
• The effort and commitment required from senior management involved in transforming strategy management processes should not be underestimated as individuals/departments will become more accountable for their actions, particularly in the public sector, and resistance to change may be experienced as a consequence.
• If an effective costing system is developed, such as the one described in this report, management will see how their staff are directing their efforts, particularly important in knowledge based organisations.
• With their intimate knowledge of the organisation, the management accountant is well placed to become very involved or direct the transformation process to manage strategy execution leading to improved effectiveness/profitability of the organisation. In this way the management accountant becomes more of a strategic partner to the business.
• The research relates primarily to the practitioner who should find it helpful as the work is based on research subject to academic rigour but is translated into a pragmatic approach via the case study; thereby demonstrating its usefulness to a real organisation.
See:” Implementation of the balanced scorecard and an alternative costing system at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh,” available at the following link:
Access the full report here
[hide extended entry]
Balanced Scorecard,
BSC Hall of Fame,
Business Leadership,
Client Success,
Competitive Advantage,
Decision Making,
ESM Development Team,
ESM Features,
ESM General Information,
ESM Tips and Tricks,
Initiative Management,
Operational Reporting,
Reporting,
Risk Management,
Software as a Service,
Strategy Maps,
Sustainability
|
Posted
7/22/10
@ 11:43 AM
by ESM Team ESM Team
Congratulations to Abu Dhabi Government with their induction into the BSC Hall of Fame for Executing Strategy on May 20, 2010 at the EMEA Summit in Madrid. This organization has been using ESM's eLearning for building and managing with the Balanced Scorecard for over two years.
Abu Dhabi is the largest of the seven emirates that comprise the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as well as its rapidly growing capital city. The emirate is ruled by the UAE president. Abu Dhabi’s Vision 2030 is to create a confidant, secure society; build a sustainable, open, and globally competitive economy; and to become one of the five top governments in the world. A unified strategy execution framework for the whole of government was chosen to translate the vision into action and outcomes. Investments are rationalized and prioritized on the basis of their ability to deliver results in social and environmental sustainability, a knowledge-based economy, human capital, infrastructure, and government excellence. Agency performance contracts help ensure a focus on strategic objectives. Within two years, GDP increased 30%, growth accelerated 74%, trade surged 156%, customer satisfaction increased 33%, and the number of Emirati women in the workforce grew 35%. “Based on the adoption of the BSC and our achievements, we have become a strategy-focused government,” says His Excellency Mohammed Ahmad Al Bowardi, Secretary-General of the Executive Council. “The structured framework of the Kaplan-Norton approach has established the basis for cross-government alignment, transparency, and accountability.” For Abu Dhabi, the road ahead is paved with success.
[hide extended entry]
In the recent Harvard Business Review article, "Managing Alliances with the Balanced Scorecard" Authors Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton and Bjarne Rugelsjoen use the Solvay/Quintiles case to demonstrate how the Balanced Scorecard management system help companies create better alliances with their partners. Read about their story, process, and success in the full text article, compliments of Quintiles Transnational Corp.:
Download here or go to: http://www.quintiles.com/information-library/case-studies/managing-alliances-balanced-scorecard/
[hide extended entry]
After a fairly significant amount of flying to get to Jakarta I set up the ESM booth, jumped online and logged into the ESM without issue. I was "blown away" by the speed. In fact, I think it was faster than many days I navigate within the application at our headquarters in Lincoln, MA. The ESM is truly globally deployed and accessible from all corners of the world.
There's great energy at the opening day of the Jakarta Summit and organizations from throughout this region are eager to apply their learning from this event. When speaking with delegates a common area of challenge with the Balanced Scorecard methodology revolved around making the strategy actionable for everyday employees in their organization, not just those who are involved in the design and reporting meetings. ESM 5 supports driving actions down to individuals through our increased action item functionality, ownership setting at the initiative and milestone level, new custom My ESM dashboard views, and primary/secondary ownership setting. I've found that these features have resonated well with the audience here.
It's fun to see how organizations are implementing the BSC framework from this region and watch the ESM community expand before my eyes. Now I just need to get over this jet lag!
[hide extended entry]
